In bits and pieces wrested from the jaws of deadlines, I exchange emails with another published author friend of mine. One of the things we discuss, as historical fiction-with-romance writers, is the nature of our relationship to history, romance, and writing.
Here are three types of writer. I'll tell you which I am, and then I hope you'll tell me whether you fit one of these types, or whether you're something else.
History-Writer:
This is me. My passion for history drives my writing. I realized this all over again last week as I went to a library and a museum to start research for a new, short-term project (a historical stage play). For the first time in over a year, I felt a true thrill and a passion for my work as a writer.
The study of history reveals the realities beneath today's surfaces. It brings me stories that reveal the interconnectedness of all of our lives, and the greatness of the divine plan throughout time. When I start researching history, my mind comes alive. The combined analytical and creative challenge of turning real history into fictional narrative is my specialty. It's one of the few activities in life that can demand intense work from every neuron I possess--and it's an endeavor important enough to make me want to go to the effort. (Certain strategy board games could challenge me that much too, if I really cared that much about the outcome, but I play board games in a more relaxed way, for fun. :-)
When we History-Writers run amok, the scary result is a novel with pages and pages of real history so dense it makes eyes cross--or historical explanations out of the mouths of characters that sound like the author just stepped in as narrator.
Romance-Writer:
Well-known historical romance author Julie Lessman wrote this blog post. She discussed her dislike of research--the same research that makes me glow and gives me all my motivation to write. Yet, Julie and I write in the same genre. What gives?
Julie is a Romance-Writer, as she recalls saying to her agent in this post (and her fans will tell you she is very good at writing romance). Historical research doesn't float her boat: telling love stories does.
Now, I can't speak for Julie, but I'll tell you some more subvarieties within this type. Some Romance-Writers find they like the trimmings and fringe benefits of historicals (pretty dresses, behavioral conventions, true gentlemen!), but they don't like all the research and the feeling of "constriction" that results from the need for a writer to avoid anachronisms. Other Romance-Writers *kind of* enjoy writing the history, just as I can *kind of* enjoy writing romance when necessary. But that doesn't change the nature of the true driving force behind an author's work.
Romance-Writers have their weaknesses too, of course, and one of the key signs of an untamed Romance-Writer in historicals is those vocabulary errors and other historical inconsistences that a good editor should catch. An untamed Romance-Writer in contemporary fiction may stretch the bounds of credibility too far in order to give us an interesting twist on the boy-girl story.
Writer-Writers:
I know a few writers who are not very motivated by content. They're passionate about the writing itself. These writers tend to gravitate toward literary fiction or toward the looser genres, such as women's fiction, so they can 'play' more without having to adhere so tightly to the conventions of a genre. That looseness can have advantages and disadvantages. Playing outside conventions can produce brilliance--or it can produce a story that doesn't cohere and satisfy the reader. Sometimes, this kind of authorial playing by Writer-Writers can create a fantastic novel that is nonetheless very hard to sell because publishers are scared of the unknown. But other times, if Writer-Writers aren't disciplined, their writing can become self-indulgent and overdone. This happens most often in literary fiction, but I've seen it happen in the less lofty genres too. But more on that next week.
These three Writer categories aren't mutually exclusive, but I hope you will join in and tell me: what is your driving passion? Do you fit into one of these three types?
Monday, May 14, 2012
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)


8 comments:
Rosslyn, As for me, I'm strictly a medical suspense writer (who's learned to add an element of romance). Of course, there's the possibility I might someday think about a vampire-legal-speculative-sports book. Or not.
Thanks for making us think.
I probably walk the line between historical and romance. I love telling a good love story but I also really like historical research. I love hunting down facts and discovering details about the time and setting that enrich a story. I especially love learning about the people who lived in the Blue Ridge Mountains in the early 1900's. Their stories get my writing wheels turning :)
Interesting.
I LOVE history! Hearing you speak of the thrill you get when you research makes me long to have more time to delve into some more research myself!
I like reading historical fiction, but not writing it. I'm not a history buff although I enjoy researching whatever info I need for my contemporary topics.
Romance isn't my genre either. I now add romantic elements to my stories but a pure romance isn't my thing.
So what is? Writing friends have told me I'm writing Inspirational Romantic Suspense. Some have suggested it's too edgy for the Christian market, and two religious for the secular one. ::sigh:: Labelling can be complex. :)
"... and TOO religious ..." Oops! How did "two" creep in there???
Hmm... I probably teeter between writer-writer (women's fiction) and romance-writer. I seem to always be on the lookout for two characters to fall in love when I read (and definitely when I write). On the other hand, I do enjoy historical fiction, but am way too intimidated to write it. So I guess I'm just a history-reader. Since one of my favorite historical figures is Abraham Lincoln, I would LOVE to write a story starring ol' Abe himself, but I know I'd be inefficient at making sure my historical details were accurate. It's just not something I'd want to attampt. Funny how that's what creates passion in some (you) and gives others (me) anxiety! LOL Thank goodness we're all so different.
P.S. Rosslyn, one of the best things about your novels is how you weave the history into your stories with small, "digestible" parts. I learned a lot from your novels but it never felt like gratuitous history lessons.
I'm with Barb! I'm a mix between romance-writer and writer-writer. Because I LOVE writing the romance. That's what makes me tick. Yet in the same breath, I love words. I love creating images with words. So I'm both.
I'm definitely not into research. That's my least favorite part of the writing process.
However, I must say....I found myself reading the first part of your post and almost wanting to research. Your passion for history is contagious!
I think I'm a blend of writer-write and historical-writer. I'm usually most deeply involved with the story and writing itself, but I also always need a historical setting. Research is fun, but can be work. While I love reading about history, I tend to have trouble when I try to research a certain topic—I never can seem to find exactly what I'm looking for. I do enjoy weaving a romantic element into some of my stories, but so far I've never had trouble with romance taking over, so to speak.
Post a Comment